[To Eurosmart members only]

 

Commission publishes the final report on competition issues in the IoT sector

Yesterday [20 January], the European Commission published its final report on the consumer IoT sector inquiry. This document identifies competition issues. It follows a preliminary sector inquiry, based on a questionnaire addressed to over 200 companies, and a consultation (only 26 respondents, including Eurosmart).

The findings of this final report are very similar to the preliminary conclusions. The European Commission concludes that there are competition concerns in the consumer IoT sector.

The European Commission notes that it may open case-specific investigations if there are anti-competitive practices. The conclusions of this report will also feed the upcoming standardisation strategy and the ongoing debate on the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

 
Final report
Commission staff working document

Access to market is governed by leading providers

The competitive situation is mentioned as one of the main barriers to entry in the IoT market. Most respondents do not see feasible to have alternatives to the existing general-purpose voice assistants (Apple’s Siri, Amazon’s Alexa and Google’s voice assistant). The costs for developing such technologies are almost prohibitively high. Therefore, the business strategy is usually to expand the IoT offering and the accessibility of smart devices via those general-purpose voice assistants. Overall, access to voice-assistants and operating systems is considered essential to compete.

In practice, this means that Amazon, Google and Apple are in a favourable position. They govern integration with their products “by imposing certification processes, which they control unilaterally in most cases”. The specifications and types of software that enable interoperability with the operating systems and the voice assistants are made available to third parties subject to the conclusion of agreements. These agreements are usually not open to negotiation.

 

Heterogeneity of standards

The European Commission observes that there is a variety of standards in the sector: open standards, protocols and proprietary and open-source technologies. Standardised technologies prevail for basic enabling technologies (e.g. WIFI or Bluetooth). However, proprietary technologies -of the leading OS and voice assistant providers- lead the other aspects, such as device definitions, application layers and user interfaces. Certain proprietary technologies are becoming de facto standards.

Some respondents called for further standardisation while other said that standardisation is not necessarily the best solution for interoperability in the sector.

 

Data

The final report underlines that OS providers and/or voice assistance providers usually have access to data in relation to a third party’s activities. By contrast, the leading voice assistance providers tend to limit data access and use for third parties, while themselves having extensive data access.

There are no industry-wise standardised formats for collecting and sharing data between consumer IoT companies.

 

Out-of-the-box features

Some respondents raised concerns regarding the out-of-the-box features that are available to users. There are practices regarding pre-installation and default-setting that may determine the visibility and findability of a service.

 

If you have any questions on this topic, please do not hesitate to contact Camille Dornier - Policy Manager: camille.dornier@eurosmart.com

 
Eurosmart
Square de Meeûs 35 - 1000 Brussels BELGIUM
Privacy Policy - EU transparency register #21856815315-64
Twitter LinkedIn
Modify your subscription    |    View online